Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Parker v. Fleischman et al
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
John Edwin Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Fleischman, Randy Smith, J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Wyles et al
as 3:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Wyles and Dep Warden Callendar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Polk County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Polk County Jail and Teresa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Wyles et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Wyles and Warden Callendar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. USA
as 4:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Cecil Samuel Parker, Jr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Parker v. Gore et al
as 2:2023cv06838
Plaintiff:
Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Doctor Gore, Doctor Ham and St. Tammany Parish Jail Doctors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
John E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
John Parker, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6439
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD PARKER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Department of Corrections, BRIAN MORAN, Secretary of Public Safety & Homeland Security and TONYA CHAPMAN, Chair of Virginia Parole Board
Parker v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Randy Smith and St. Tammany Parish Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Tarrant County Officials
as 4:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Lewis Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Tarrant County Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
