Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hess v. Murphy
as 2:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hess
Defendant:
Patrick J Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02887
Petitioner:
Patrick Daniel Murphy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. BOLDUC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
PATRICK M MURPHY
Defendant:
BOLDUC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DANA LNU and PATTI LNU
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. BOBROW et al
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
PATRICK M MURPHY
Defendant:
DAVID J BOBROW and BRENDAN O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stamps v. Hurst et al
as 1:2021cv00533
Respondent:
Officer K. Koperniak, Jeffrey Hurst, Officer G. Roberts and others
Petitioner:
John C. Stamps, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. Andrews
as 2:2019cv00683
Respondent:
Warden J. Andrews
Petitioner:
Patrick Cokay Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murphy v. Collier et al
as 4:2019cv01106
Defendant:
Corr. Inst. Div. Dir Lorie Davis, TDCJ Executive Dir Bryan Collier and Warden Billy Lewis
Plaintiff:
Patrick Henry Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2018cv00135
Petitioner:
Patrick Lynwood Murphy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patrick Murphy v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-70030
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK HENRY MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Brown v. Murphy et al
as 1:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael William Brown
Defendant:
Patrick J Murphy , Danielle Foster and Jamie Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
