Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Springsteen v. Proctor & Gamble Company et al
as 1:2019cv01931
Plaintiff:
Jerry Springsteen
Defendant:
Astra Zeneca Manufacturing Company and Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demos v. BeAm, Inc et al
as 6:2016cv00471
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
BeAm, Inc, Tootsie Roll, Industries, See's Candies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos et al v. Proctor & Gamble
as 1:2015cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbison v. NC Dept Correction et al
as 5:2010ct03159
Plaintiff:
Larry Donnell Harbison
Defendant:
NC Dept Correction and Proctor & Gamble/Fixodent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Consumer Product, et al
as 10-1375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, DBA Harry Markopolos
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY IMPROVEMENT ACT, CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, NANCY NORD and others
Riches v. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, The et al
as 1:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, The, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Nancy Nord and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jonathan Riches v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 08-6590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY, PEPTO-BISMOL and FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - WILLIAMSBURG
Riches v. The Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 7:2008cv00151
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
The Proctor & Gamble Company, Pepto-Bismol and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
