Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Cook v. Yetman et al
as 4:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Cook
Defendant:
Officer M. Yetman, A. Shumate and St. Francois County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Gibson
as 23-10691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James E. Sanders
Defendant / Appellee:
Kristen Gibson, Bryan D. Reitsma, M. Barthela and others
Sanders v. Gibson et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Defendant:
Kristen Gibson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deyton v. S.C.D.C. et al
as 9:2022cv04748
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Deyton
Defendant:
S.C.D.C., Nurse R. Cook, Amy Enloe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
(PC) Ekene v. Cook, et al.,
as 2:2022cv01443
Plaintiff:
Linus Ekene
Defendant:
R. Cook, D. Laughlin and R. Agredano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv05176
Plaintiff:
Jamil Rasul Bey
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Charles D. Baker, Karyn E. Polito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv03016
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams
Defendant:
Zachary R Cook, Mark D Many, Brittany P Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Novodvorschi v. Smith et al
as 7:2021cv00038
Defendant:
James E. Bavousett, Gregory S. Hicks, John Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Novodvorschi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Uduji et al
as 7:2021cv00040
Defendant:
LaVonda J. McLemore, Leslie S. Sims, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James Earvin Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
