Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 24-40361
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Caldwell
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Lippstock v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01001
Petitioner:
Robert Franklin Lippstock
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bell v. Eads et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Eads and Trinity Food Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Eads et al
as 1:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Eads and Trinity Food Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Eads et al
as 1:2023mc00034
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Eads and Trinity Food Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. TDC Employees
as 23-40448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Franklin Caldwell
Defendant / Appellee:
TDC Employees
Alston v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01016
Petitioner:
Robert Franklin Alston
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Franklin #787786 v. Washington et al
as 1:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Unknown Klien, Unknown MaCauley, Unknown Battle and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin #787786 and Jason L. Sanders #305405
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Voss et al
as 6:2020cv06033
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dawyne Walton
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe, B Lewis, Dillion R Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. McCormick et al
as 3:2019cv00416
Plaintiff:
Cletus John Robert Franklin
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Health Care, Inc., David Kerns and Patrick McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
