Cases 1 - 10 of 405
Delaune v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Donald Delaune
Defendant:
Gien Powell, Susan Hudson, Orleans Sheriff Offce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruffin v. Wilhem et al
as 4:2024cv04059
Plaintiff:
Mwamba M Ruffin
Defendant:
Chase Wilhem, Mark N Williams, Tyrone Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Taylor Ruffin Herrington
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huesman v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2024cv00375
Not Yet Classified:
Deputy MICHELLE RUFFIN
Plaintiff:
Ms. JULIE STEWART HUESMAN and Julie Stewart Huesman
Defendant:
Sheriff Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Michelle Ruffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUFFIN v. USA
as 1:2023cv01131
Petitioner:
ANTHONY RAVON RUFFIN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ruffin v. Ashcraft
as 3:2023cv03345
Plaintiff:
Davon Ruffin
Defendant:
. Ashcraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruffin (PS) v. Flores
as 1:2023cv03183
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Ryan Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Pierce County Council et al
as 3:2023cv06044
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dwayne Ruffin
Defendant:
Pierce County Council, Patty Jackson and NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haze v. Medical Provider et al
as 5:2023ct03300
Plaintiff:
Grant Ruffin Haze, III
Defendant:
Medical Provider, Nurse Jane Doe 1, Nurse Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
