Cases 1 - 10 of 104
POSLIGUA v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2023cv22337
Petitioner:
MANUEL ALBEY CASTRO POSLIGUA
Respondent:
MRS. S. THOMPSON, JENNIFER ORDONEZ and A. ACEVEDO-SOTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00732
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rafiel Riggins v. Robin Cook, et al
as 23-1058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAFIEL RIGGINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBIN COOK, Correctional Officer, MIKE SHIMMELPENNY, Correctional Officer, aka Shimmel Penny, DAVID KOSKELA, Sergeant and others
Tibbs v. Gender Dysphoria Group et al
as 1:2022cv11849
Plaintiff:
Jerome Tibbs and Nina Harmony Tibbs
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Gender Dysphoria Group, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullings v. Burnett et al
as 7:2022cv07922
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Mullings
Defendant:
Edward Burnett, Michael Daye, C. Churns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Virgil Green v. M. Smith, et al
as 22-1658
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGIL R. GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SMITH, Custody Officer for MSI Garment Factory, D. PELLER, Classification Director and S. THOMPSON, RUM
Virgil Green v. M. Smith, et al
as 22-1633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGIL R. GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SMITH, Custody Officer for MSI Garment Factory, D. PELLER, Classification Director and S. THOMPSON, RUM
Cummings v. Weller et al
as 1:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Cummings
Defendant:
A. Weller, CO2 Powers, Z. Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Walls v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
Nirin Walls
Defendant:
Christopher S. Thompson, Robert E. Wegman, Brandon A. Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
