Cases 1 - 10 of 27
HOOD v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
TODD HOOD
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARTIN MAGNUSSON, LARS OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Miller, IV v. Mary Saar
as 12-7946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ALBERT MILLER, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ANN SAAR, Former Secretary, GARY MAYNARD, Secretary, WILLIAM SONDERVAN and others
Dawn Ball v. Lamas, et al
as 12-2747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWN MARIE BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
LAMAS, WRIGHT, NOONAN, C/O and others
Dawn Ball v. Famiglio, et al
as 12-2604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWN MARIE BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
FAMIGLIO, DR., GLORIA DIGGAN, R.N., EGAN and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
DILLELA, Nurse, VANESSA NICOLA, Hygenist, NELMS, Dentist and others
Miller v. Saar et al
as 1:2011cv03572
Plaintiff:
John Albert Miller, IV
Defendant:
Mary Ann Saar, Gary Maynard, William Sondervan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Mahoney v. Steve Hammond, et al
as 10-36060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE ALAN MAHONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE HAMMOND, DEVON SOHRUM, MAGGIE MILLER STOUT and others
Mahoney v. Hammond et al
as 2:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Steve Alan Mahoney
Defendant:
Steve Hammond, Devon Sohrum, Maggie Miller Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cofield v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2009cv01569
Plaintiff:
Aaron Cofield and Aaron Cofield
Defendant:
State of Maryland, State of Maryland, Mary Ann Saar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ball v. Lamas et al
as 1:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Lamas, Wright, Lt. Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren Chase v. C. Butler
as 09-6224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
C. BUTLER, Cpl., D. HICKS, Cpl., MICHAEL HICKS, Cpl. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
