Cases 1 - 10 of 61
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saxon v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert Saxon
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant:
T. MCCORKLE, CONYERS, D. REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Fullerton v. Saxon et al
as 2:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Fullerton
Defendant:
Tim Saxon, Max Mucklow, Michael Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Velasquez et al
as 6:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Hunter
Defendant:
Unknown Velasquez, Unknown Peddy, Unknown Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCLAIN v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
MARTINA WHITE, RALPH MCCLAIN, SHAWN WHITE and others
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANGELUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKHEAD v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2023cv01764
Plaintiff:
ACTORA MECONN BANKHEAD
Defendant:
C. BISHOP, SAXON, M. PFLEEGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Hunter
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry . Smith, Smith County, Compliance Sergeant FNU Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MOTON v. SAXON et al
as 1:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
M. SAXON, T. EVANS, K. BLANTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Saxon v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01110
Petitioner:
Michael Saxon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
