Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lawson v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03985
Defendant:
Lt. David Sandridge, Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Tracy Rodgers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Jane/John Doe, Ms. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2023cv00406
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Genesis Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGURK v. MISIURA et al
as 3:2018cv00431
Plaintiff:
MARK ALLEN MCGURK
Defendant:
DAVE MISIURA, KRISTEN OHARA, ROBERT SANDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGURK v. MISIURA et al
as 2:2018cv00611
Plaintiff:
MARK ALLEN MCGURK
Defendant:
DAVE MISIURA, KRISTEN OHARA, ROBERT SANDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lionel Adkins v. John Doe, et al
as 17-11279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIONEL BERNARD ADKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Senior Warden, Allred Unit, JOHN DOE, Assistant Warden, Allred Unit, JOHN DOE, Chief Class, Allred Unit and others
PETERSON v. DIETER et al
as 1:2014cv00923
Defendant:
DIETER, GRAY, CHRIS MORRISON and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Doe et al
as 7:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lionel Bernard Adkins
Defendant:
John Doe, Robert Adams, Tammie Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. MORRISON et al
as 1:2014cv00655
Defendant:
C. MORRISON, BEN SANDMAN and MR. SNIDER
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Orona v. Lloyd Aschberger, et al
as 11-20425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD V. ORONA
Defendant - Appellee:
LLOYD ASCHBERGER, ABBAS KHOSHDEL, JOSE AGUILERA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
