Cases 1 - 10 of 933
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Martinez et al
as 6:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Reese
Defendant:
Annette Martinez, Jodi Sawyer, T. Matz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Sussman v. Shevaun Harris, et al
as 24-10565
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHARLES SUSSMAN, a.k.a. El Maestro
Defendant:
SHEVAUN HARRIS, in their official capacity, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, (hereinafter Wellpath), DONALD SAWYER, Corporate Vice President at Wellpath, supra. and others
Sawyers v. Cleveland County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant:
Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Scott et al
as 6:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Mark Charles Bailey
Defendant:
FNU Scott, FNU Parker, Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Sussman v. Shevaun Harris, et al
as 24-10442
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHARLES SUSSMAN, a.k.a. El Maestro
Defendant:
SHEVAUN HARRIS, in their official capacity, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, (hereinafter Wellpath), DONALD SAWYER, Corporate Vice President at Wellpath, supra. and others
Rollen v. Sawyer
as 3:2024cv02048
Plaintiff:
Jan Keyshone Rollen
Defendant:
Sara Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayvon Boatman v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC, et al
as 24-10975
Plaintiff:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant:
WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, DONALD SAWYER, EMILY SALEMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
