Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Scott v. Andrede et al
as 5:2023cv01558
Plaintiff:
Phillip Garland Scott and Scott, P. Garland
Defendant:
Ofc. FNU Andrede and Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02257
Petitioner:
Robert Muhammad and Siraj Ibrihim
Respondent:
Scott P Smith, United States Marshals Service, Chaplin Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Employer's and Employee's of The Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 7:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Pena
Defendant:
Employer's and Employee's of The Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bryan Collier, Jimmy S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roeder v. Schnurr
as 22-3152
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTT P. ROEDER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN SCHNURR
Roeder (ID 65192) v. Schnurr
as 5:2020cv03275
Respondent:
Dan Schnurr
Petitioner:
Scott P. Roeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byrd v. Nelson et al
as 5:2020cv01282
Defendant:
M Hannah, Bossier Parish Sheriff, Scott Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin Watson, Jr. v. Scott P. Bonham, et al
as 17-3034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN WATSON, JR., United States of America, ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT P. BONHAM and JOHN HESKETT
Nathan Jacobs v. S. Julian, et al
as 17-2329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN E. JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. JULIAN, Assistant Warden, SCOTT P. BONHAM, Chaplain and D. SWEENEY, Unit Manager
Thompson #261144 v. Jaklevic et al
as 2:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burnell Thompson #261144
Defendant:
Peter Jaklevic, Unknown Jaklevic, Scott P. Hill-Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thompson #261144 v. Jaklevic et al
as 2:2016cv00252
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burnell Thompson #261144
Defendant:
Peter Jaklevic, Scott P. Hill-Kennedy, Marcee Purcell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
