Cases 1 - 10 of 94
(PC) Hammler v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Defendant:
Sacramento County, City of Represa, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Saldana v. Seibel et al
as 1:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Saldana
Defendant:
K. Seibel, C. Alcanzar, V. Tapiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEIBEL v. KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
ERIC M. SEIBEL
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and ALEX SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Schroeder et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Tammy Schroeder, Jesse Thompson, Randy McGonigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Celli v. Engelmayer et al
as 1:2022cv06535
Plaintiff:
Lucio Celli
Defendant:
Judge Engelmayer, Judge Swain, Judge Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
Yuma, County of, Bianca Acosta, Julian Aguayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hill v. Seibel, et al.
as 2:2021cv02382
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill and Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Kimberly Seibel, Fennefer Weaver, Foseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Seibel
as 4:2021cv06997
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Kimberly Seibel, Fennefer Weaver, Foseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Seibel et al
as 4:2021cv03189
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Officer Macias, Kimberly Seibel, T. Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florence v. Benrostrol et al
as 3:2019cv00446
Defendant:
M. Martin, A. Silva, J. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
David Florence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
