Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Shockley
Defendant:
Sweet, Clemmons, Schirmer and others
Shockley v. Collin County Detention Facility
as 4:2024cv00508
Petitioner:
Charles Wayne Shockley
Respondent:
Collin County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHOCKLEY v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2023cv03849
Petitioner:
JERMAINE SHOCKLEY
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON
as 1:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
KAI GERALD SHOCKLEY ANDERSON
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAW v. METRO SOUTH STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2023cv01863
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. SHAW
Defendant:
METRO SOUTH STATE POLICE, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-16, TROOPER DOUGLAS ZEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkhalter v. Gray et al
as 4:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Marquise Burkhalter
Defendant:
Kevin Gray, Grace Hobbs, Adam J Derycke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heriberto Castro Gutierrez v. Doris Shockley
as 22-15920
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERIBERTO CASTRO GUTIERREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DORIS L. SHOCKLEY
Inkton v. Titus et al
as 4:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lavell Inkton
Defendant:
Savannah Titus, Steve Kunzweiler and Madison Shockley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erskine et al v. Mears et al
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Justin Erskine, Lateef Dickerson, Matthew Hoskins and others
Defendant:
Truman Mears, Joseph Beck, Marvella Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
