Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TIPTON v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
SKY TIPTON
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID CLOSE, MICHELLE IVICIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
Antonio Jerido v. Mike Henline, et al
as 22-12337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO ORLANDER JERIDO
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE HENLINE, Warden, in his individual capacity, T. MCDOWELL, Officer, in his individual capacity, JAMES M. NORMAN, Nurse, in his individual capacity and others
BOWEN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00220
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, CHAPLIN MILLER, Captain LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROKITA v. FARABAUGH et al
as 3:2020cv00016
Defendant:
LT. T. MCDOWELL, JOHN WETZEL, OFFICER SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
MARK C. ROKITA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jerido v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Officer Evans, James Norman, T. McDowell and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Orlander Jerido
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven McDowell v. USA
as 16-2705
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN T. MCDOWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. McDowell
as 3:2016cv50004
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven T. McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jay Lurz v. Jon Galley
as 08-6573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY TIMOTHY LURZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JON P. GALLEY, Warden, OFC. L. WHITEMAN, CO2, LT. ARNOLD, H.U.#6 Manager and others
Lurz v. Galley et al
as 1:2007cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jay Timothy Lurz
Defendant:
Jon P. Galley, L. Whiteman, Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
