Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 24-40102
Petitioner:
Mark Tyrone Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SMITH
as 1:2023cv01825
Plaintiff:
TYRON JOHNSON
Defendant:
SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SMITH
as 1:2023cv01799
Petitioner:
TYRON JOHNSON
Respondent:
SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Smith
as 3:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Tyron Johnson
Defendant:
Smith
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Tyron Johnson
Defendant:
Ron Neal and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. White
as 1:2022cv01417
Petitioner:
Tyrone Johnson
Respondent:
David P. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. White
as 1:2022cv03840
Petitioner:
Tyrone Johnson
Respondent:
David P. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. South Mountain Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv01760
Plaintiff:
Cal Tyrone Johnson and Tyrone Johnson
Defendant:
South Mountain Police Department, Phoenix, City of, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
