Cases 1 - 10 of 6,281
Campbell v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Winfred Campbell
Defendant:
State of Louisiana and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Petitioner:
Christopher Wesley
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdikarim v. Fitzgibbons et al
as 0:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Sheriff Barry Fitzgibbons, Tim Brennan, Conor R West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasso v. Little et al
as 4:2024cv04101
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Jasso
Defendant:
Roy Little, Alexander Stuart, Jamar A Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Pounds et al
as 1:2024cv02488
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allyn Carson
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Pounds, Head Nurse Germany and Douglas Count Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1543
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, PATRICK W. MCDERMOTT, Sheriff, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office, DANIELLE FRANE, Superintendent, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office and others
Lay v. Hooper
as 24-30350
Petitioner:
Richard B. Lay
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cummings v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Charles Cummings
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Unknown Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proffitt v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
David Everett Proffitt and David E Proffitt
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, John Galipeau, Kenny Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
