Cases 1 - 10 of 16
King v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Timothy E King
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Warr, Timothy Darenski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy King-El v. Matthew W. Wilson
as 22-6242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY D. KING-EL
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW WILSON, formerly identified as FNU Wilson and SAINT T. TAPP, Unit Manager Assistant, in his Individual and Official Capacities
Defendant:
JEFFERY E. JAMES, Unit Manager, in his Individual and Official Capacities
King-El v. Wilson et al
as 1:2020cv00229
Defendant:
FNU Wilson, Saint T. Tapp and Jeffery E. James
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. King-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King-El v. Wilson et al
as 5:2020ct03261
Defendant:
Saint T. Tapp, Sgt. Wilson and Jeffery E. James
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. King-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kevon King
Defendant:
Pima County Sheriff's Department and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy King-El v. Lonnie Meadow
as 17-6341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY D. KING-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
LONNIE MEADOWS
King et al v. Perry et al
as 5:2017ct03043
Plaintiff:
Timothy Royal King, Michael Blakney, Derick White and others
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, W. David Guice, Cynthia Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. King et al
as 2:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Marks Shelton
Defendant:
Timothy A King, H Gratz, Erion J Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King-El v. Meadows
as 5:2016ct03047
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. King-El
Defendant:
Lonnie Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Nevada ex rel. The Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00640
Defendant:
Dr. Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, Samuel Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
