Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Davis v. McGuiness
as 9:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Tommy Davis
Respondent:
Thomas McGuiness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Edwards et al
as 5:2018cv00470
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lewis
Defendant:
John Bell Edwards, Gene Reynolds, Foster Compbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Cape Girardeau County Jail
as 1:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Tommy Davis
Defendant:
Cape Girardeau County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bean v. Chaney et al
as 3:2015cv01050
Plaintiff:
Daryl R Bean
Defendant:
Angela Chaney, Mark Bateman, Tommy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Van Dyke v. Scott Slusser
as 15-6938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE, Pro Se Writer Attorney At Law Prophet Pastor Rabbi
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT SLUSSER, SEAN F. PERRIN, Attorney - Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Van Dyke
as 1:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Frank D. Whitney, Robert James Davis, 12 Jury Members and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI v. SLUSSER et al
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI
Defendant:
SCOTT T. SLUSSER, SEAN PERRIN, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Van Dyke v. Terrence Boyle
as 14-7144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, Judge, GRAHAM C. MULLEN, WAYNE ABERNATHY and others
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant:
ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Boyle et al
as 5:2014ct03159
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle, Graham C. Mullen, Wayne Abernathy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
