Cases 1 - 10 of 65
James Trainor v. Wellpath, et al
as 23-1771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, CRNP SUTHERLAND and others
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Lammers v. Nebraska (State of) et al
as 8:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jess T. Lammers
Defendant:
Nebraska (State of), Nebraska Dept. Health and Human Service, Lincoln Regional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trainor v. Jones et al
as 4:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Blake Wilson, Swatzel, Shane Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Rory Kevyn Trainor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins et al v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2020cv02200
Defendant:
San Diego County Jail, Michael Garcia, William Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hawkins and Darryl Dunsmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TRAINOR v. SUPT. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2020cv00260
Defendant:
RICHARD DIBELLA, C.O. YO-YO, C.O. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TRAINOR v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Defendant:
CRNP BRENDA HARTZELL, C. HAYS, LISA LAMOREAUX and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES TRAINOR and JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Umansor v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv00819
Defendant:
Mereda, Malcom, Trainor and others
Plaintiff:
Edgar Umansor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Robinson et al
as 2:2019cv02298
Defendant:
CO Ramone Robinson, CO Smith, Warden Teri Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
