Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Price v. Hardy et al
as 5:2023cv03058
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
D. Hardy, V. Evans and C. Steinback
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Behzadi et al
as 3:2019cv00070
Plaintiff:
Earskin V Evans
Defendant:
Nurse Zach, Dr Faramarz Behzad, Dr Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Doe
as 1:2018cv22284
Plaintiff:
Earskin V. Evans
Defendant:
John/ Jane Doe, Dr. Faramaez Behzad, Dr. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alan S. Abraham v. M.W. Howard et al
as 2:2014cv06131
Plaintiff:
Alan S. Abraham
Defendant:
Lt. D. V. Evans, Lt. D. V. Evans, Capt. R. Groves and others
King v. Evans
as 5:2014ct03061
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. King
Defendant:
V. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hicks v. Moore et al
as 1:2013cv02592
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lee Hicks
Defendant:
D. Moore, Hose, E. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Hendricks v. Powatan Corr. Center
as 10-7522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY HENDRICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
POWATAN CORR. CENTER WARDEN/SUPERINTENDENT, sued in their individual and official capacities, MR. GRAHAM, Counselor, sued in their individual and official capacities, V. EVANS, L.T. and others
Hendricks v. Powatan Corr. Center Warden/Superintendent et al
as 2:2010cv00445
Plaintiff:
Terry Hendricks
Defendant:
Powatan Corr. Center Warden/Superintendent, Mr. Graham, V. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Donald et al
as 1:2009cv01696
Plaintiff:
Tracy Anthony Miller
Defendant:
James Donald, Brian Owens, Augusta State Medical Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Avon Davies v. R. Hughes, et al
as 08-17466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AVON DAVIES
Defendant - Appellee:
R. HUGHES, Correctional Officer, D. V. EVANS, Correctional Lieutenant, F. GONZALEZ, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
