Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Small v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv01127
Petitioner:
Vincent Harry Small
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Mueller et al
as 9:2023cv02539
Plaintiff:
Vincent Harris
Defendant:
Steve Mueller, Paul Ackerson and John Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
HARRIS v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2022cv03195
Petitioner:
VINCENT HARRIS
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cass v. The United States District Court, Eastern District of New York et al
as 1:2020cv06071
Defendant:
Robert Sommers, Charles J. Hynes, John K. Jordan, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Mickey Cass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Small v. Waters et al
as 2:2017cv02170
Plaintiff:
Vincent Harry Small
Defendant:
Kyle Waters, Slaughter and J.B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Small v. Waters et al
as 6:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Vincent Harry Small
Defendant:
Kyle Waters, Stacey Slaughter, J. Bryant Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laguer v. Stolle et al
as 2:2017cv00436
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Velez Laguer
Defendant:
Ken Stolle and Vincent Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Harris et al
as 2:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Martin
Defendant:
Vincent Harris and Robert Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2009cv02735
Plaintiff:
Vincent Harris
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County 30th and 13th Judicial Court, Shelby County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Harris v. Kathy Mendoza-Power
as 08-16495
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCENT HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
