Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sharma v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Sohrab Sharma
Defendant:
Colette Peters and W D Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grandinetti v. Mee et al
as 1:2020cv00110
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti and Grandinette
Defendant:
Patricia Sells, Wesley Mun, Dr. Roberto Sebastian and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Valenzuela et al
as 1:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Hawaii Paroling Authority (HPA-DPS), Warden M. Frink, newer A/W D. Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Brown et al
as 2:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Mr. W. D. Brown and Mrs. B. Cabell
Plaintiff:
Antonio J. Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henton v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
as 1:2019cv00462
Plaintiff:
W. D. Henton
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henton v. Mohr
as 1:2018cv02763
Plaintiff:
W. D. Henton
Defendant:
Gary Mohr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henton v. Sheriff Ashtabula County, Ohio
as 1:2018cv02768
Plaintiff:
W. D. Henton
Defendant:
Sheriff Ashtabula County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Sutton et al
as 4:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Scott Dennis Hayes, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Sutton, Rosemary Green, Mitch Ralston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shearer et al v. Ralston et al
as 4:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
Shuntay A. Shearer
Defendant:
Mitch Ralston, Bedford, Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightfoot v. Bernsen et al
as 4:2017cv02935
Plaintiff:
Eric Keith Lightfoot
Defendant:
Herbert Bernsen, John Doe, John 1-10 Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
