Cases 1 - 10 of 23
OWENS v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
WILLIAM OWENS
Respondent:
PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pike v. Libby et al
as 5:2024ct03031
Plaintiff:
Nathan Pike
Defendant:
Officer Tammy Libby, Sgt. William Owens, Officer Cory Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
WILLIAM OWENS
Respondent:
D. ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2023ct03226
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Sgt. William Owens, Joshua Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. NORTH CAROLINA ADULT CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE HALL
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA ADULT CORRECTION, SGT WILLIAM OWENS, JOSHUA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Sayre et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Owen Underwood
Defendant:
D. T. Sayre, N. G. Elbon, T. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen, Jr. v. Kernan
as 3:2018cv00665
Petitioner:
Chester William Owen, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abreu v. Bruen et al
as 6:2017cv06394
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Kevin Bruen, Nancy J. Heywood, John C. Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Overbaugh et al
as 9:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Michael Overbaugh, Raymond Catina, Vincent Cuda, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spivey v. Phoenix et al
as 3:2013cv00693
Petitioner:
William Owen Spivey, II
Respondent:
Richard Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
