Cases 1 - 10 of 2,940
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 24-1545
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, WELLPATH MEDICAL, LLC, CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner, Department of Correction and others
Morris v. Borwick et al
as 3:2024cv01470
Plaintiff:
Barry Morris
Defendant:
John Borwick, Wexford Health Sources Inc, P. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Wexford Health Care et al
as 3:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care, Percy Myers, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6548
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., ESTATE OF CAROLYN BRYANT and FEDERAL JUDGE ELIZABETH MULLIGAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FEDERAL JUDGE RICHARD E. MYERS, II, NEW HANOVER COUNTY NC SUPERIOR COURT and others
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
COUNSELOR RAULS, JOHN DOE, COII SHAKRISTY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamez #131401 v. Lesinski et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Robert Carrasco Gamez, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Lesinski, Unknown McElroy, Travis Fitzgibbon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barmore v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Barmore
Defendant:
P. Myers, Stevens, M Foureh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Lewis et al
as 4:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Counselor Rauls, COII Shakristy Lewis, SGT Henry Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Dewayne McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMullan v. Tanner et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
William B. McMullan
Defendant:
Joel Tanner, Shane Bozeman, William Barrett and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
