Cases 1 - 10 of 14
McMullan v. Tanner et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Defendant:
Shane Bozeman, Angel Myers McIllrath, William Barrett and others
Plaintiff:
William B. McMullan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Barrett et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Le'Derrick Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
William Barrett, Joshua Finkley, Kevin Jackson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. City of East Liverpool, et al.
as 4:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
William Barrett
Defendant:
City of East Liverpool, East Liverpool Police Dept, Christopher Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barrett v. State of Washington
as 4:2020cv05250
Petitioner:
William Barrett
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barrett v. Kelly et al
as 4:2019cv01888
Defendant:
Kelly, Bell, Glenn and others
Plaintiff:
William Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Kelly et al
as 4:2019cv00487
Defendant:
Kelly, Bell, Glenn and others
Plaintiff:
William Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slade v. Estes et al
as 5:2018cv01776
Respondent:
Warden Estes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
William Barrett Slade, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barrett v. MTC Corp. et al
as 3:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
MTC Corp., Unknown Walker, Norris Hogans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Health Assurance Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01045
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
Health Assurance Inc. , Carl Reddix , Carl Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Health Assurance Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
John William Barrett
Defendant:
Health Assurance Inc., Carl Reddix, Carl Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
