Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Holmes v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
William Holmes
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Pitts et al
as 1:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gentry
Defendant:
Samuel Pitts and William Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Pitts et al
as 4:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gentry
Defendant:
Samuel Pitts and William Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRITTON v. CITY OF ATLANTIC et al
as 1:2017cv01986
Plaintiff:
LONNIE BRITTON
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC, YOLANDA SHABAZZ, STEPHEN RANDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Thompson v. William Holm, et al
as 15-1928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM HOLM, MATTHEW LARSON, RANDALL LASHOCK and others
Thompson v. Holm et al
as 2:2013cv00930
Plaintiff:
Michael L Thompson
Defendant:
William Holm , Mathew Larson, Randall Lashock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonso Mendoza-Tarango v. Pontce, et al
as 12-50470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALONSO MENDOZA-TARANGO
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU PONTCE, Classification, Bexar County Adult Detention Center, R. RODRIGUEZ, Classification, Bexar County Adult Detention Center, FNU WALHERT, Classification, Bexar County Adult Detention Center and others
Counter Defendant - Appellee:
JASON COWLES, Deputy Bexar County Adult Detention Center
Mendoza-Tarango v. Pontce et al
as 5:2011cv00501
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Deputy Jason Cowles, Doctor FNU Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Alonso Mendoza-Tarango
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasiem et al v. Paterson et al
as 1:2010cv02627
Plaintiff:
Allah Kasiem, Garnett Johnson, Jesse Shannon and others
Defendant:
David Paterson, Andrea W. Evans, New York Board Of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
