Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WITHERSPOON v. USA
as 2:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
CAMEO WITHERSPOON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Edward Witherspoon
Defendant:
Ronald S Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witherspoon v. Corey et al
as 9:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Terrance Witherspoon
Defendant:
Joseph Corey, John Doe, Corrections Captain John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITHERSPOON v. TRINKLE et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES WITHERSPOON, JR.
Defendant:
ALICE TRINKLE, JASON JOBE, CHELSA HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Money v. Warden of Johnson State Prison, et al
as 23-12940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ISAIAH MONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF JOHNSON STATE PRISON, WARDEN OF GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION STATE PRISON, VILLEGAS and others
Witherspoon v. USA
as 3:2023cv03258
Petitioner:
Justin Witherspoon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WITHERSPOON v. TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 4:2023cv00272
Petitioner:
WILLIAM WITHERSPOON
Respondent:
TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witherspoon v. Colvin
as 23-570
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jerome Witherspoon
Respondent / Appellee:
John Colvin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
