Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 38
United States of America v. All Items Seized By The Madera County Sheriff on or About September 23, 2009, Incorporated Herein by Reference as Attachment A', We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011mc00017
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: All Items Seized By The Madera County Sheriff on or About September 23, 2009, Incorporated Herein by Reference as Attachment A
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. $311,229.00 in US Currency from Arizona Asset Management and Recovery Incorporated account located at Bank of America et al
as 2:2011cv00504
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $311,229.00 in US Currency from Arizona Asset Management and Recovery Incorporated account located at Bank of America, $163,987.42 in US Currency from World Food Ghana Limited account located at TD Bank and $2,000.00 in US Currency from World Food Association Organization account located at Citibank
Claimant: World Food Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Currency $3,900.00 et al
as 2:2011cv10881
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Currency $3,900.00, One 2005 Frieghtliner Tractor VIN 1FUJAPCK45DN85293 and One 2002 Refrigerated Trailer VIN 1UYVS253X2U501750
Claimant: Gregory Darnell Morgan and G and M Refrigerated Systems, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
US v. State of Oregon, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2154
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner - Appellee: STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF WISCONSIN
Petitioner: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant: TERENCE PATRICK MCLAUGHLIN, GEORGE CHEMALI and CLP, INCORPORATED
SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOBY, INC. v. DELTA FAUCET COMPANY
as 1:2010cv00478
Defendant: ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, EVANS MANUFACTURING, INC. and others
Plaintiff: SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Movant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc
as 1:2010cv01195
Plaintiff: San Francisco Technology, Inc.
Defendant: Adobe Systems Incorporated and Graphic Packaging International, Inc
Movant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv06083
Plaintiff: San Francisco Technology, Inc. and San Francisco Technology, Inc.
Defendant: Adobe Systems Incorporated, The Brita Products Company, Delta Faucet Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yancy's L and M Market, Incorporated v. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
as 2:2009cv14988
Petitioner: Yancy's L and M Market, Incorporated
Respondent: United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
United States of America v. Various Cartons of Men's and Women's Cologne as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and Incorporated herein
as 1:2009cv00889
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Various Cartons of Men's and Women's Cologne as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and Incorporated herein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately $2,822,224.75 in Funds Seized From Eight Bank Accounts et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv03119
Plaintiff: United States of America and United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $2,822,224.75 in Funds Seized From Eight Bank Accounts, One 2007 Porsche C4 Cabriolet (VIN: WP0CB29927S777234), One 2005 Porsche Cayenne S (VIN: WP1AB29P35LA66041) and others
Claimant: Harris County, Texas, Harris County, Texas, GST U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?