Cases 1 - 10 of 251
United States of America v. The Premises, Buildings, Appurtenances, Improvements, and Real Property Located at 15 Elizabeth Drive, Lockport, New York,
as 1:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Premises and Real Property at 15 Elizabeth Drive, Lockport, New York and The Premises, Buildings, Appurtenances, Improvements, and Real Property Located at 15 Elizabeth Drive, Lockport, New York,
Claimant:
Ostolski Property Management LLC, Michael Ostolski, Dawn Ostolski and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Real Property
as 6:2023cv03145
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property
Claimant:
Byrde Enterprises, LLC, Ray L. Marple and The Vernon L. Nichols Trust
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $10,009.75 in funds seized from Empower Credit Union Account ending in 9593 in the name of Toni L. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$10,009.75 in funds seized from Empower Credit Union Account ending in 9593 in the name of Toni L. Smith, $153.52 in funds seized from Citizens Bank Account ending in 5842 in the name of Toni Lynn Smith, $24.66 in funds seized from Citizens Bank Account ending in 8576 in the name of Toni Lynn Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Duane Berry v. United States Department of Treasury
as 23-6213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUANE LETROY BERRY, by and through Federal Trustee, Duane L. Berry
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
USA v. Real Property Located at 6385 N. Academy Boulevard, Colorado Springs, Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 6385 N. Academy Boulevard, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Real Property Located at 275 South Academy Boulevard, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Real Property Located at 1301 West 4th Street, Pueblo, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Tesla Model 3 2019 VIN #5YJ3ElEB6KF421949
as 4:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tesla Model 3 2019 VIN #5YJ3ElEB6KF421949
Claimant:
Laura L Porter-Bowley and Wheels Financial Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Castaneda v. United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2022cv06723
Plaintiff:
Rebecca L Castaneda
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Miller Pharmacy Services L L C v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 3:2022cv02424
Petitioner:
Miller Pharmacy Services L L C doing business as Prescription Shoppe Pharmacy
Defendant:
U S Drug Enforcement Administration and Anne Milgram
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In the Matter of $26,000.00 In U.S. Currency
as 3:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF $26,000.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY and $26,000.00 In U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Rodney L. Washington
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Genuine Rolex 18k Solid Rose Gold Watch, GMT Master II Design et al
as 3:2022cv01223
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
GENUINE ROLEX 18K SOLID ROSE GOLD WATCH, GMT MASTER II DESIGN WITH SOLID ROSE GOLD OYSTER BRACELET REF. 126715. GOLD CONDITION., GENUINE ROLEX MEN'S18K YACHTMASTER II ALL YELLOW GOLD WATCH, WHITE DIAL, CERAMIC BLUE BEZEL OYSTER BRACELET, WITH DOUBLE CLASP. MODEL NUMBER# 116688, SERIAL NUMBER H44V7303 INCLUDES ORIGINAL, GENUINE ROLEX 18K SOLID ROSE GOLD AND STAINLESSSTEEL WATCH, YACHTMASTER II DESIGN REF. 116681, SERIAL NUMBER# 5538L503, WHITE DIAL WITH BLUE COLORED CERAMIC BEZEL, INCLUDING WARRANTY CARD, ORIGIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
