Cases 21 - 30 of 147
Pomales v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 1:2020cv10258
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Rene Pomales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pomales v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 3:2020cv10258
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Rene Pomales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Candice Lewis v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08392
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclsuive and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Candace Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alejandro Arzola v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07578
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC, Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Betty Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Arzola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 3:2019cv05054
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kala Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devyn S. Reece v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00733
Defendant:
AT and T Mobility Services LLC and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Devyn S. Reece
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Devyn S. Reece v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03023
Defendant:
AT and T Mobility Services LLC and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Devyn S. Reece
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Selisky v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 3:2018cv00153
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Erika C. Selisky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Atkins et al v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 2:2018cv00599
Plaintiff:
Joseph Atkins , Justin Roach and James Hull
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bigby v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 5:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ualthan Bigby
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
