Cases 21 - 30 of 257
Robinson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2022cv01326
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Antonio Gracia, Tafarnia Mott and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Ali v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Mirza Hyder Ali
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Smith v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2021cv01731
Plaintiff:
Senchal Denea Smith
Defendant:
United State of Postal Service and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ryan Harter v. USPS, et al
as 21-35129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN HARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION LETTER CARRIERS AFL-CIO
Nichole Welch v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2021cv01424
Plaintiff:
Nichole Welch
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Jen Coleman, Lori Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Garth v. VMS et al
as 4:2021cv04066
Plaintiff:
Donnie Garth
Defendant:
VMS, RPM, Kevin Ruffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Durden v. Postmaster General of the United States et al
as 3:2021cv01890
Plaintiff:
Denea Durden
Defendant:
Postmaster General of the United States and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Walsh v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2021cv01454
Plaintiff:
Martin J Walsh
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
WATSON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2021cv19102
Plaintiff:
KIM WATSON
Defendant:
POSTMASTER GENERAL LOUIS DEJOY and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Ortiz-Oyola v. Transporte Lorenzana et al
as 3:2021cv01355
Plaintiff:
Jesus J Ortiz-Oyola
Defendant:
Transporte Lorenzana and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
