Cases 41 - 50 of 241
Goldberg v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00562
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc, AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Goldberg and Austin Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HOLSCLAW v. AT&T, INC.
as 4:2017cv00016
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HOLSCLAW
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hendrix et al v. Mobilelink Virginia, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00394
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hendrix and Sean Hazer
Defendant:
Mobilelink Virginia, LLC, Mobilelink USA, Cricket Wireless, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Edwards v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company et al
as 1:2016cv04875
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edwards
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Co. and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DAWSON v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN et al
as 1:2016cv00616
Defendant:
AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T, INC., FIDELITY INVESTMENTS and others
Plaintiff:
JILL E. DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rhoden v. AT&T Inc.
as 1:2016cv03075
Plaintiff:
Glennis Rhoden
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sweten v. AT&T Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
Debbie Sweten
Defendant:
AT&T Inc , AT&T Services Inc, FMR LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Charlotte Ernsting v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al
as 8:2015cv01682
Defendant:
AT and T Inc, Aon Hewitt Benefit Payment Services LLC, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Ernsting
Walton et al v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv03653
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. and AT&T Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wendell Walton, Marilyn Dito, Anthony Ureta and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gambino et al v. Devlin Electrical Services LLC et al
as 1:2015cv12871
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Gambino and Lawrence J. Bradley
Defendant:
Devlin Electrical Services LLC, Matthew Devlin, AT&T Inc. and others
Trustee:
South Shore Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
