Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Fightmaster v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Darrell Fightmaster
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Con-Way, Inc./XPO Logistics, Inc. Short and Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alderson v. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
as 7:2017cv09329
Plaintiff:
Gregory Alderson
Defendant:
XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Coker v. XPO Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00557
Plaintiff:
Gene Coker
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Lo v. XPO Logistics-SC of Texas, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00674
Defendant:
XPO Logistics-SC of Texas, LLC and XPO Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chimeng Lo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reyes v. Sears Holding Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv04719
Plaintiff:
Victor Reyes
Defendant:
Sears Holding Corporation, Sears Roebuck & Company and XPO Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
ESPINAL v. BOB'S DISCOUNT FURNITURE, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02854
Plaintiff:
OMAR A. ESPINAL
Defendant:
BOB'S DISCOUNT FURNITURE, LLC, XPO LOGISTICS, INC. and JANE AND JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Upton v. Con-Way Multimodal, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00232
Plaintiff:
Courtney M. Upton
Defendant:
Con-way Multimodal, Inc. , XPO Logistics, Inc. and Brett Eifler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Quinlan et al v. XPO Logistics, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Brice Quinlan and Laura Willis
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc. and XPO Logistics of Delaware, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pregent et al v. XPO Logistics, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00993
Plaintiff:
Alexis Pregent , Jennifer Massat , Megan Kuchenbecker and others
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Bey et al v. XPO Logistics, Inc.
as 6:2016cv02195
Plaintiff:
Reina Ortiz Bey , Ricardo Pacheco , Ashlee Allard and others
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
