Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 891
Michelle Mills et al v. Molina Healthcare, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01813
Plaintiff: Michelle Mills, Coy Sarell, Chad Westover and others
Defendant: Molina Healthcare, Inc., John Does, The Board of Directors of Molina Healthcare, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nohara v. Prevea Clinic, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01079
Plaintiff: Alison J Nohara and Patti J Szydel
Defendant: Prevea Clinic, Inc., The Board of Directors of Prevea Clinic, Inc., Prevea Clinic Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Glick v. ThedaCare Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01236
Plaintiff: Joseph B Glick
Defendant: ThedaCare Inc and The Board of Directors of ThedaCare Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Goldstein v. Rochester Bituminous Products, Inc.
as 23-1474
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATHAN P. GOLDSTEIN, as he is Executive Director, Massachusetts Laborers' Benefit Funds
Defendant / Appellant: ROCHESTER BITUMINOUS PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant: BATISTA CONTRACTING LLC and ROCHESTER PAVING CO., INC.
Keith Krutchten, et al v. Ricoh USA, Inc, et al
as 23-1928
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEITH K. KRUTCHTEN, ANGEL D. MURATALLA and WILLIAM BEGANI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: RICOH USA, INC, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF RICOH USA INC, RICOH RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE and others
Luckett v. Wintrust Financial Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03968
Plaintiff: Lynetta Luckett
Defendant: Wintrust Financial Corporation, The Board of Trustees of Wintrust Financial Corp., The Administrative Committee of the Wintrust Financial Corp. Retirement Savings Plan and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Miller v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv00594
Plaintiff: Matthew A Miller and Matthew A. Miller
Defendant: Pfizer Inc., Board of Directors of Pfizer Inc., The Savings Plan Committee of Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fitzsimons v. New York City District Council of Carpenters and J
as 23-815
Plaintiff / Appellant: Peter Fitzsimons, Regina Ann Devlin Fitzsimons, Caitlin Patricia Fitzsimons and others
Defendant / Appellee: New York City District Council of Carpenters and Joiners of America, New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Board of Directors of The Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al v. Ironman Productions, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03560
Plaintiff: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan, Board of Directors of The Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan and others
Defendant: IRONMAN PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Minnesota corporation, and Ironman Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Covington et al v. Biogen Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv11325
Defendant: The Retirement Committee, Board of Directors of Biogen, Inc., Biogen Inc. and others
Plaintiff: David Covington, Tansy Wilkerson and Daisy Santiago
Consolidated Plaintiff: Sarah Gamble
Consolidated Defendant: Biogen 401(K) Savings Plan Committee and Does No. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?