Cases 81 - 90 of 236
Lawson v. General Engines Company Incorporated
as 8:2016cv02708
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M. Lawson
Defendant:
General Engines Company Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Burton v. Lawson et al
as 1:2016cv00645
Plaintiff:
Stacie Tomika Burton
Defendant:
Todd Lawson, Karen Brewington, Christopher Keeler and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
LAWSON v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC
as 2:2015cv00508
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWSON
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Lawson v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 6:2015cv01915
Plaintiff:
Betty Lawson
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.
as 3:2015cv05128
Plaintiff:
Andrew Tan and Raef Lawson
Defendant:
Grubhub, Inc. and Grubhub Holdings Inc
Interested Party:
Caviar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
Cooper et al v. Coastal Sunbelt Produce, LLC
as 1:2015cv03263
Defendant:
Coastal Sunbelt Produce, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Cooper , Justin Crudup , Allen Hewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lawson et al v. Speed
as 1:2015cv00400
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Lawson and Arretta Lawson
Defendant:
Jim Speed
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Lawson v. Anne Fontaine USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08020
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Lawson
Defendant:
Anne Fontaine USA, Inc. and Ari Zlotkin
Counter_claimant:
Anne Fontaine USA, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Tiffany Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson, et al v. Cemex, et al
as 15-4097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KELLY T. ANDERSON, DEAN A. BAILEY, ARYON E. BAKER, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CEMEX, INC. and SALARIED EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN OF SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
