Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Hall v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP
as 4:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
David Hall
Defendant:
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hill et al v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 7:2023cv03494
Plaintiff:
Brian Hill, Jason Mathis and Cruz Vasquez
Defendant:
Frito-Lay Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Philpot v. Frito Lay North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05040
Plaintiff:
Raphael Philpot
Defendant:
Frito-Lay North America, Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Addison v. Frito-Lay Inc
as 3:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
James Addison
Defendant:
Frito-Lay Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Montgomery v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 7:2022cv06982
Plaintiff:
Starr Montgomery
Defendant:
Frito-Lay Inc, Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, L.P. and FL Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
January Crews-Sanchez v. Frito Lay, Inc.
as 22-1831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANUARY CREWS-SANCHEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
FRITO LAY, INCORPORATED
Clark v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Gary Clark
Defendant:
Frito-Lay, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act
Hill et al v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brian Hill, Jason Mathis and Cruz Vasquez
Defendant:
Frito-Lay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
POULSON v. PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS et al
as 1:2022cv05196
Plaintiff:
ALLISON POULSON
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS and Frito-Lay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Parrish v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
as 7:2022cv04556
Plaintiff:
Thomas Parrish and Tony Bradley
Defendant:
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. and Pepsico Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
