Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hargraves v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation
as 5:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hargraves
Defendant:
Select Comfort Retail Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hargrave v. AIM Directional Services, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00784
Defendant:
AIM Directional Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marcus Hargrave
Respondent:
RigUp, Inc.
Bamberg v. The Results Companies, LLC
as 0:2020cv61420
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bamberg, Shandellah Martin, Amanda Mesot and others
Defendant:
The Results Companies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hargrave v. AIM Directional Services, LLC
as 2:2018cv00449
Defendant:
AIM Directional Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marcus Hargrave
Chen et al v. Xpresspa at Term. 4 JFK, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01347
Defendant:
Xpresspa at Term. 4 JFK, LLC, Xpresspa Atlanta Terminal A, LLC, Xpressa Atlanta Terminal C, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chen, Xiao Ling Chen, Zeng Biao Teng and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hargrave v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2012cv02450
Plaintiff:
Brenda V. Hargrave
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
HARGRAVE v. B&B FOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
as 2:2010cv00269
Defendant:
B&B FOOD DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DENNIS HARGRAVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hargraves v. University of San Diego et al
as 3:2010cv02043
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hargraves
Defendant:
University of San Diego and DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Donna Hargrave v. Aegon USA LLC
as 10-30720
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONNA HARGRAVE
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH GENERAL CORPS LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Hargrave v. Parker Drilling Co et al
as 6:2010cv00141
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Co and Parker Drilling Co
Plaintiff:
Kyle P Hargrave
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
