Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mock v. Skorpios Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Skorpios Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gerald Mock
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramirez v. Marathon Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06881
Defendant:
Wlodek Zawaski, glen mock, Marathon Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Zoilo Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lara Soriano et al v. Marathon Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01888
Plaintiff:
Margoth Lara Soriano and Cresensio Rodriguez Valle
Defendant:
Marathon Systems, Inc. and Richard L. Mock
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MOCK v. GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
as 2:2016cv01600
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MOCK
Defendant:
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Benjamin et al v. VHU Express, Inc . et al
as 1:2016cv20642
Plaintiff:
Benjamin, Eleuterio A. Benjamin, Luis Alonso and others
Defendant:
VHU Express, Inc, Lisa D. Bythewood and Craig Bythewood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mock v. Fairfield Residential Company, LLC
as 1:2014cv09048
Plaintiff:
Elmer Mock
Defendant:
Fairfield Residential Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HUTCHENS V. MT. AIRY TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE, INC., et al
as 1:2014cv00713
Defendant:
MT. AIRY TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE, INC., STOKES TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE, INC., MOORESVILLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HUTCHENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Daniel Mock v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage
as 14-1782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL MOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, d/b/a Freddie Mac
Mock, Jr. v. Netadyne Networks et al
as 1:2014cv00632
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Mock, Jr.
Defendant:
Netadyne Networks and Daniel Mezaache
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mock v. Harvest Management Sub TRS Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Judy Mock
Defendant:
Harvest Management Sub TRS Corp., Harvest Management Sub LLC and Harvest Creekside at Shallowford Retirement Residence LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
