Cases 91 - 100 of 14,471
Paul Bailey v. Warden, William E. Donaldson Correctional Facility
as 24-13355
Respondent:
WARDEN, WILLIAM E. DONALDSON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
PAUL EUGENE BAILEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08900
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bailey v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10485
Plaintiff:
Wanda Bailey
Defendant:
Loreal USA Products, Inc., Luster Products, Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. L'oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10552
Plaintiff:
Charli Bailey
Defendant:
SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Strength of Nature LLC, L'oreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01922
Defendant:
Ben Gutierrez, Sonya Carrillo, Michael Minov and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kay Bailey
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08854
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01828
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. CITY OF PLAINFIELD et al
as 2:2024cv09794
Defendant:
POLICE CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER FORTUNKA, PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, DIRECTOR JAMES T. ABNEY and others
Plaintiff:
OMARION G DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
