Cases 91 - 100 of 1,343
Burris v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv20146
Plaintiff:
William Burris
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURRIS v. FENTRESS et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY BURRIS
Defendant:
FENTRESS, 2 UNKOWN NAME VANDERBRUGH COUNTY DEPUTIES, VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sirshun BurrisIn re: Sirshun Burris
as 23-1240
Petitioner:
In re: SIRSHUN DONTRELL BURRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Burris v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Roy William Burris, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burris v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Shane Burris
Respondent:
Tyson Foods Inc and Amir Ata Jabarzadeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Burris v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv14676
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burris
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sirshun Burris v. USA
as 23-1164
Petitioner / Appellant:
SIRSHUN DONTRELL BURRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
