Cases 91 - 100 of 909
(PC) Johnson v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holbrook et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Darrell Holbrook, Tammy Holbrook, Eddie Bentley and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bluitt v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01003
Petitioner:
Maurice Bluitt and Bluitt
Respondent:
Dean Williams, David Johnson and Virgil Ensey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Eischen
as 0:2022cv01039
Petitioner:
Ronald David Johnson
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2022cv02012
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv03137
Plaintiff:
Lou Brandon and Hillary Wright
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, Mayor Bill De Blasio, Commissioner Dermot Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tiefenback v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Seth Tiefenback
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Travis Trani, Ruth Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Johnson v. United States
as 22-1701
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ronald David Johnson
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID JOHNSON and KC JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
