Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,456
Koetsier v. Does 1-166, As Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2023cv03051
Plaintiff: Albert Koetsier
Defendant: Does 1-166, As Identified in Exhibit 2, Doe 1 Anna Cowper, Doe 2 YLSMINC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
LASSITER-COVINGTON et al v. TOWNSHIP OF HILLSIDE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv07461
Defendant: UNDERSHERIFF DENNIS BURKE, IN HIS OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, JOHN DOES #11-12 (AS YET UNIDENTIFIED UNION TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS OR OFFICERS), SHERIFF OFFICER OGRADY, IN HIS OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES and others
Plaintiff: NYISHA LASSITER-COVINGTON, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JERMAINE COVINGTON, NIJEE COVINGTON, A MINOR BY HIS GUARDIAN NYISHA LASSITER COVINGTON, NYISHA LASSITER-COVINGTON, INDIVIDUALLY and others
Cross Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF HILLSIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
S.V. et al v. County of Riverside et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00860
Plaintiff: S. V., Naomi Bravo and Esteban Viramontes
Defendant: County of Riverside, Chad Bianco, Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rashid v. Kurtulus et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00722
Plaintiff: Master Rashid
Defendant: Kalican Kurtulus, Jerome F French, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oleg Varlitskiy v. Manny Campos, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-55426
Plaintiff / Appellant: OLEG VARLITSKIY, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: DEPUTY SHERIFF MANNY CAMPOS, an individual, DEPUTY SHERIFF DANIEL BROWN, an individual, INVESTIGATOR THOMAS SALISBURY, an individual and others
Defendant: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a public entity and DOES, 7-10
Doe 1 et al v. Thornbury et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Minor Doe 1 and others
Defendant: William C. Thornbury, Jr., Audria Denker and Eric Friedlander
Intervenor Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Amicus Curiae: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Pediatric Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 23-946
Petitioner: Towaki Komatsu
Respondent: The City of New York, Howard Redmond, NYPD Inspector, sued in individual and official capacities, Ralph Nieves, former NYPD Lieutenant, sued in individual and official capacities and others
Kar et al v. Patel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv02064
Plaintiff: TANMAY KAR, PROFITPAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JOHN DOE 2 and others
Defendant: VIMAL PATEL, DEVESH PATEL, Alinor Holdings, Inc. doing business as Onriva and others
Intervenor: Shailesh Patel, John Doe 1 and JOHN DOE 7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Berdecia et al v. Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc. d/b/a HIMA San Pablo Bayamon et al
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff: Nelson R Berdecia, Annia Berdecia, Conjugal Partnership Berdecia-Berdecia and others
Defendant: Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc. d/b/a HIMA San Pablo Bayamon, Dr. Jose A Matos-Negron, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tanvir v. Comey
as 23-738
Plaintiff: Awais Sajjad
Plaintiff / Appellant: Muhammad Tanvir, Jameel Algibhah and Naveed Shinwari
Defendant / Appellee: James Comey, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, "John" Tanzin, Special Agent, FBI, Sanya Garcia, Special Agent FBI and others
Defendant: Rand Beers, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, John S. Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, Christopher M. Piehota, Director, Terrorist Screening Center and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?