Cases 91 - 100 of 5,059
Scott v. Walgreen Co.
as 6:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Robin V. Scott
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Other:
Donna Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Young v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Story v. Pierson
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Daisy Story
Defendant:
David Pierson
Other:
Donna Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Brown v. New York City Police Department
as 24-112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOEL L. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN FIRSOV, CITY OF NEW YORK, NYCD C.O. COVINTON and others
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, FIFTH PRECINCT NEW YORK COUNTY, ANDREW OLIVER and others
ANRO INC v. DORMIFY, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00231
Defendant:
DORMIFY, INC., ON CAMPUS MARKETING, LLC, OCM ACQUISITION CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
ANRO INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
Johnston v. Antle et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Paul Johnston
Defendant:
Doyle Antle and Sheila LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kearney, Michael v. Cromwell, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Kearney
Defendant:
Daniel Cromwell, Corey Rahlf, Sheldon Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapatio Foods, LLC v. Castaneda et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Tapatio Foods, LLC
Defendant:
Raymond Alfred Castaneda, Jr. and Katelyn Marie Doyle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Finnell v. DeWine et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kyle Finnell
Defendant:
Govern Mike DeWine, Lt. Jon Husted, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
