Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 22,190
Evans v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04012
Plaintiff: Shawaana Evans
Defendant: Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03074
Petitioner: Matthew Evan Davis, Sr.
Respondent: Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
RODGERS v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv06202
Plaintiff: EVAN RODGERS
Defendant: CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, EUGENE CALDWELL, II, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bechel et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Defendant: The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Charles Bechel, Marcia Hickson, Raven El and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
William Windsor v. Orinda Evans, et al
as 24-11670
Plaintiff: WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant: JUDGE ORINDA D. EVANS, JUDGE WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., JUDGE JULIE E. CARNES and others
Not Yet Classified: SERVICE
Chandler v. Templeton
as 3:2024cv00394
Plaintiff: Kyle Chandler
Defendant: Evan J Templeton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff: Anthony S Hickman and Anthony Scott Hickman
Defendant: Indiana State of, Eric J Holcomb, Todd Rokita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01781
Trupia v. Heritage Hard Assets LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00498
Plaintiff: Anthony Trupia
Defendant: Heritage Hard Assets LLC, Kyle Patton, HLV Ventures and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?