Cases 91 - 100 of 102
Taylor v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv03009
Plaintiff:
Keith Desmond Taylor
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Unknown Officer, Gregory P. Novack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Woehrle et al
as 3:2009cv03010
Plaintiff:
Keith Desmond Taylor
Defendant:
Carla M. Woehrle and William D. Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor
as 3:2009cv02811
Petitioner:
Keith Desmond Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor
as 3:2009cv02810
Plaintiff:
Keith Desmond Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009mi00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Beleno et al v. Texas Department of State Health Services et al
as 5:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Andrea Beleno, Geoffrey N. Courtney, Maryann Overath and others
Defendant:
Texas Department of State Health Services, David L. Lakey, Texas A&M University and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States v. Keith Taylor
as 09-1474
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Keith Marlon Taylor
Allstate Ins Co v. Levell, et al
as 08-4861
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALLSTATE INS CO
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES J. LEVELL and DIANE LEVELL
Defendant - Appellant:
ROXANE HIGGINBOTHAM TAYLOR, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF KEITH LARSON TAYLOR, DECEASED
Ronald Zueski v. Robert Prause, et al
as 08-2288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD ZUESKI
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PRAUSE, Michigan State Police Officer, DENNIS MCCARTHY, Michigan State Police Officer, GINA MASTERSON, Taylor Police Officer and others
Defendant:
CITY OF WOODHAVEN
NEWSOME v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2008cv04525
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY NEWSOME
Defendant:
KEITH B. TAYLOR, KENNY MILLER, DELAWARE CO. PRISON RECORD OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
