Cases 91 - 100 of 173
Haggwood v. Magill et al
as 5:2015cv03271
Plaintiff:
Jerome Antonio Haggwood
Defendant:
John Magill, Holly Scaturo, Kimberly Poholchuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fetner v. Magil et al
as 1:2015cv02535
Plaintiff:
William Bryan Fetner
Defendant:
John Magil and Holly Scutturo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidd v. Magil et al
as 5:2015cv02440
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Kidd
Defendant:
John Magil and Holly Scutturo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regina Hunter v. Nikki Haley
as 15-1620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINA M. HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE HONORABLE NIKKI R. HALEY, Governor, State of South Carolina Government, MR. GARY A. MIXON, Administrator, Sumter County South Carolina Government, MRS. NAOMI D. SANDERS, Chairman D-1, Sumter County South Carolina Government and others
Fetner v. Magil et al
as 1:2015cv02265
Plaintiff:
William Bryan Fetner
Defendant:
John Magil and Holly Scutturo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Dillard et al
as 0:2015cv02542
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. Hudson, Sr.
Defendant:
Christal M. Dillard, Hennepin County, The Muncipality of, State of Minnesota, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hunter v. Haley et al
as 3:2015cv00547
Plaintiff:
Regina M Hunter
Defendant:
Nikki R Haley, Gary A Mixon, Naomi D Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Christy et al
as 1:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Defendant:
Christopher Christy, Mitchell A Magill, Nathan Trimble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. The South Carolina Dept of Mental Health et al
as 6:2015cv00186
Plaintiff:
Benny Ray Barfield
Defendant:
The South Carolina Dept of Mental Health, Holly Scutturo and John MaGill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
