Cases 91 - 100 of 531
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv02337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
O'NEILL v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00416
Petitioner:
DAVID O'NEILL
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRYAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02061
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
O'Neill v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv08343
Plaintiff:
Peggy O'Neill
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02060
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Mitchell v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06258
Plaintiff:
Seth Mitchell
Defendant:
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., CIGNA Corporation, American International Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04835
Defendant:
Police Sgt. Joseph Anderson, Police Sgt. Nelson Ayala, Police Comm'r James P. O'Neill and others
Plaintiff:
Flor Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Splittorf et al
as 3:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
Aryion Sanders
Defendant:
Joe Splittorf, Michael O'Neill, City of Alton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neill v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv01669
Petitioner:
Neal O'Neill
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, California Medical Facility, Duel Vocational Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LIOUNIS v. KREBS et al
as 1:2017cv01621
Plaintiff:
PETER LIOUNIS
Defendant:
KEVIN KREBS, CHRISTINA D. TROIANA, NIKKI GRAMIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
