Cases 91 - 100 of 523
DAVIS et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv02720
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS and PEARLY DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Davis v. Benson et al
as 1:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Detroit Department of Elections, Janice Winfrey, Jocelyn Benson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01531
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Paul Hupp, et al v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Assoc, et al
as 20-56004
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY MICHAEL STOH, KEYSTONE PACIFIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC., STEVEN I. MEHLMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ARISTEA HUPP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL HUPP
Davis et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05107
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis and Toni M. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. COOK INCORPORATED, et al.
as 1:2020cv02514
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, et al., COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS and ATENAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOVALL v. STORACE et al
as 1:2020cv00186
Defendant:
ROBERT DAVIS III and CHELISE STORACE
Plaintiff:
CARLA STOVALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92710
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Benson et al
as 1:2020cv00915
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hill and Robert Davis
Defendant:
Janice Winfrey, Jocelyn Benson, Detroit Deparment of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
