Cases 91 - 100 of 248
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2018cv00557
Defendant:
R. Walz, C. Cline, Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. YOUNG
as 1:2018cv15798
Respondent:
S. YOUNG
Petitioner:
CHASE RYAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hollinquest v. Suh et al
as 2:2018cv01840
Defendant:
S. Toth, Dennis Holmes, S. Mecham and others
Plaintiff:
Dasay Hollinquest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLADDEN v. YOUNG et al
as 9:2018cv01187
Respondent:
WARDEN S. YOUNG, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Warden of FCI Raybrook
Petitioner:
DONALD LEON GLADDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Trimed Home Care Services, Inc.
as 2:2018cv04749
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline S Young and Jacqueline S. Young
Defendant:
Trimed Home Care Services, Inc.
Barglow v. Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01812
Defendant:
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Todd S. Young and Stephen R. Davis
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Barglow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Stone v. Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01672
Defendant:
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stephen R. Davis and Todd S. Young
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Stone, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Staublein v. Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01647
Defendant:
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Todd S. Young, Stephen R. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
James Staublein, Thomas Wood, Charles R. Stone, II and others
Petitioner:
David Harper, Howard E. Derdiger, Susan Derdiger and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rogers v. Ezell et al
as 5:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Rogers
Defendant:
Boyce Ezell and John S. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. Kean et al
as 3:2018cv00458
Plaintiff:
Stacey R Young and Nicholas S Young
Defendant:
Edward Kean, Margaret Kean, Maggie's Bar & Grill, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
